SpicaBooks.Com/Party_Democratic_Progressive.html

05 Aug 09 - Copyright 2004-9 by Andrew Homer - Webmeister StarHeart Web Designs - Publicly-Funded Healthcare -

Democratic Party - Green Party - Republican Party - Heresy Party - Framing the issues

Got Progressive Democrats?

Progressive Democrats of America

Google Groups Subscribe to PROGRESSIVE AGENDA
Email:
Browse Archives at groups.google.com
 
 

* Jim Hightower - Michael Moore - New America Foundation in_California

Progressive Democrats of America together in the movement, Vickie Butcher (CA-52), Mike Copass (CA-53), Clint Curtis (FL-24), Bill Durston (CA-03), Cheryl Ede (CA-50), Donna Edwards (MD-04), Ed Fallon (IA-03), Steve Harrison (NY-13), Mahdi Ibn-Ziyad (NJ-01), Ed O'Reilly (Senate, MA), Mary Pallant (CA-24), Samm Simpson (FL-10), Harry Taylor (NC-9), Steve Young (CA-48).

Impeachment

Recently, their annual state conventions, the so-called Democrats of Vermont and New Mexico are calling for the impeachment of President Shrub, Jr because of violating civil rights and misinforming Americans regarding sending troops into harms way unnecessarily.

An Emergent Progressive Majority: Americans are tired of voting against someone. It’s time to recruit leaders who’ll speak clearly to people’s real needs and problems.

by Gloria Totten, 10.05.05

Progressives should be optimistic as we look toward the 2006 midterm elections. A recent CNN/ Gallup Poll shows that a record-high 54 percent of Americans believe that the United States made a mistake in going to war in Iraq. Surging gas prices in the wake of Hurricane Katrina and struggles to keep up with the cost of living are fueling widespread pessimism about President Bush’s handling of the economy. According to recent Associated Press polls, only 28 percent of voters think the country is heading in the right direction. An August Harris poll showed that 58 percent of respondents believe Bush is doing an “only fair or poor” job as president, while several new polls at press time recorded his approval at barely 40 percent -- the lowest in his presidency. And there’s blame to spare: Only 37 percent of the public approves of the way the Republican-controlled Congress is doing its job, the worst grade for lawmakers in eight years.

But optimism alone won’t regain control of the Congress or the majority of state legislatures in 2006. It won’t elect a progressive president in 2008. And it won’t reverse decades of conservative ascent.

Conservatives, first working outside the Republican Party and ultimately taking it over, have labored for more than 30 years to get where they are today: in control at all levels. They built powerful media and message enterprises to hone their ideas and make those ideas sound reasonable to mainstream Americans. They recruited “movement conservatives” to run for office, trained them to run effectively on a party-line agenda, and systematically fielded them in key state and local races that would nationalize this agenda and mobilize voters up and down the ticket.

In the late 1970s, when Democrats controlled the majority of elected offices from state legislatures to the presidency, conservatives created GOPAC, their candidate and recruitment operation. It was resurgence on the right, the product of new leadership that was willing to look to the long term to win power. Despite having been in the minority for decades, this new conservative Republican leadership knew it must marry the need for short-term victories with a long-term partisan strategy for taking back power. The leaders developed a 10-year plan. And it worked.

* * *

Progressives have traditionally left candidate recruitment to the official arms of the Democratic Party. But for the last 15 years, the party has engaged in a deliberate strategy to recruit candidates who can largely fund their own campaigns or draw corporate financial support thanks to their conservative fiscal and social positions. The party encouraged candidates to abandon or avoid popular progressive issues in order to try to increase their appeal to swing voters. This has proven to be a failed strategy; Democrats have lost seats in nearly every election. Worse, by trying to moderate their core views and values, Democrats have come to be perceived as weak and indecisive, with no bold ideas of their own.

Consider this from an August Democracy Corps memo by Stan Greenberg and Matt Hogan: “The Democrats are 7 points ahead in the race for Congress and, indeed, have led by an average of 6 points over the last 4 months … . But for all that, the Democrats need to do much more to turn this into a tidal wave. Their own image has not improved and most of the gain in congressional vote margin has come from the Republicans’ decline.”

Americans are tired of voting against someone. They are seeking candidates who are willing to stand up for something. If progressives want to win elections, they need to recruit leaders who will speak clearly to people’s real needs and problems.

That’s the challenge my organization and others with similar vision have set out to address. In 2004, Progressive Majority launched the only exclusive, comprehensive program to recruit and train a “farm team” of progressive candidates to run for state and local office. We piloted the program in Washington state, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania in 2004, running 100 candidates -- and winning 41 of our races. Notably, of the 59 candidates who lost, 33 continue in the program and are running again. Even when we lose, we grow.

Ours is a strong and successful model for candidate recruitment. First, we identify every legislative opportunity available in the next election and begin aggressively recruiting progressive leaders to run in those races. Second, we train our candidates and their staff on how to run an effective race. Third, we provide each candidate with myriad political resources, including extensive one-on-one “coaching” on campaign planning, fund raising, message and communications, and more. Finally, we map out the state’s political plan through 2008 so the entire progressive community understands where the political opportunities lie.

Our results suggest that we’re on to something. In 2004, Progressive Majority was one of only two organizations to provide early support to Brian Weinstein, a candidate for the Washington state Senate. Our work in his race, and our advocacy within the progressive community, encouraged the state’s political players to coalesce around Weinstein’s candidacy. His victory, along with that of Craig Pridemore, whom we also supported, flipped control of the Senate in Olympia to Democrats, who went on to pass a record number of progressive bills this last legislative session.

In 2005, Progressive Majority expanded the program to two additional states, Arizona and Colorado. By the end of July, our farm team boasted 167 candidates, including 64 running in 2005, 63 in 2006, and 40 in 2007 or later. Twenty-eight percent are people of color, 48 percent are women, and 22 percent are rank-and-file union members.

Our biggest win in this year’s municipal elections occurred in Wisconsin in April when Mark Harris defeated the conservative eight-year incumbent for Winnebago County executive. Harris eked out a 51-percent victory in the gop–dominated Fox Valley, where John Kerry received 46 percent last November. A community leader who built a political base while chairing the Oshkosh City Council, Harris ran on a straightforward message of competence and common sense. This was a critical pickup for progressives and demonstrates that we can win in tough districts when we groom leaders from the community.

In keeping with our strategy of identifying true leaders, we recruited Claudia Kauffman, a member of the Nez Perce tribe, to run for state Senate in Washington -- after the Democratic Party establishment had advised Kauffman to delay her decision while encouraging other (read: white) candidates to run. Currently, our staff is working with her to aggressively raise funds to ward off primary opposition. If victorious, she would be the only Native American in the Washington Senate and one of the first ever to serve in that state’s Legislature.

* * *

Our work is being done in collaboration with other important endeavors necessary to build a progressive political movement because we understand that, done alone, candidate recruitment and development will not produce concrete progressive policy advancements. In turn, if every other function is performed without sufficient numbers of progressive candidates to carry our messages and engage voters, we will fail to realize genuine and enduring reform. We have formed advisory councils in each of our states -- led by the local heads of the labor, women’s, environmental, civil-rights, education, and health-care organizations -- to advise and guide our candidate-recruitment work, thereby ensuring that it is serving the broader progressive movement.

The frustration voters feel is not esoteric. People are struggling to maintain jobs that pay short of a living wage; small-business owners are straining to keep up with rising health-insurance costs; mothers and fathers are losing their sons and daughters in Iraq; those exurban and rural voters that cost Democrats the last presidential election are suffering at the hands of an administration that puts corporations and the wealthy above them.

Real people with real problems -- those are the people whose futures are being sacrificed by the conservatives in power. Isn’t it time we gave them leaders they can be proud to support?

Gloria Totten is the executive director of Progressive Majority.

The fact that without asking anyone within the Green Party of the U.S., members of the Republican Party bought full page advertisements in national periodicals (USA Today) promoting the Green Party without acknowledging who paid for the ads. This cynical manipulation of America's political process by the Republican's completely undermines the Green's naive and honorable intentions at party building.

Instead of doing the right thing, the Republican Supreme Court Justices voted straight down the party line to condone the miscounted votes in Florida in the 2000 General Election.

For decades, us lefties knew that the Republicans were looking for an excuse to erode civil liberties. On 11 September 2001, the Al Qaeda attack on America which 3,000 people died gave the Republicans that excuse.

So, now we have the psuedo-Patriot Act which has made it illegal to even protest.

What the hell was 1776 and the subsequent 8-yr war all about?

So, rather than to let the Republicans exploit the Green Party against the Democratic Party; rather than to let the Republicans comandeer America's political process; it behooves the Green Party to disband and to have its members to aid the Democratic Party to expose and destroy the morally remiss and evil Republicans.

All of the current members of the Green Party should register as Democratic Party voters (I did), refer to ourselves as Progressive Democrats, join the Progressive Society, and strive to get the lame Democratic Party platform to be replaced by the progressive Green Party platform.

I'm NOT saying that the Greens should throw in the towel and vote for lackluster Democratic mediocre candidates. Rather former Greens should be running as candidates on the Democratic party ticket.

But to priortize our priorities: we can NOT let any more Republicans win any more elections.

How great minds think alike: other organizers who are copying my game plan: Green Democratic Alliance, Greens for Kerry, & Vote Pair.

The Green Democratic Alliance have an interesting idea

"Promote the Two Tier Approach: Democrats helping Greens build long term political presence by helping them win local, regional, and 'nonpartisan' seats in city councils, county commissions, state government, and boards and such (which fits into the Green politicalphilosophy of building from the bottom up) in return for Greens agreeing not to run spoilers against good Democratic candidates in larger national and state races."

I was so pissed that the Green Party ran someone, David Cobb, against Ralph Nader in the 2004 election that I referred to myself as a Naderite for Kerry.

Why "Fair Trade" Agreements Suck

"Free trade agreement" is Republican for:

1 - You're free to lose your job.

2 - The factory owners are free to shut down, disassemble, crate up, relocate to overseas, reassemble, reopen, and hire locals in India, Indonesia, the Phillipines, or Mexico and pay them a fraction of what you were paid.

3 - Your children are free to go to a junior college since you can't afford to send them to a good university.

4 - You're free to cross-train into a job with a much lower salary since you no longer have the expertise nor seniority in that new skill.

5 - You're free to work 2 jobs to replace the one you had with a good paycheck.

6 - Shareholders are free to make larger contributions to the congressmen who saved them big $$ by voting for those "free trade" agreements.

7 - Besides having more than half the employees in America, small business is the most dynamic component of the national economy. Capitulating to the shareholders is stupid. Congress should be listening to the small business man. Small business needs customers with deep pockets. Having customers who are union labor improves that factor.

StarHeart Shop

Progressive Links

 
 

The Constitution of the United States

Political Parties of Europe

Impeach Bush

NextCard Internet Visa


New York Times Books@barnesandnoble.com

In Association with Amazon.com

_